Tetbury CONNECT

We're seeing an explosion in house building locally and everywhere. Are these homes being built so the unstoppable influx of young men arriving in boats can be accommodated in towns and cities?

If the population is increasing then it needs more homes. But the rate of new building is alarming to many and causes us all to ask - where will this end? Are we to lose our precious green spaces?

And so the march to cover our landscape with more houses goes on. People need homes of course - but where does it all end? Should there be a debate about population growth and related topics?

There's a massive push from gov't on councils to build more houses. The problem is - where're they to be built? Building in prime country villages is not going down well with residents. So what is the answer?

Someone has decided the Cirencester and Kemble area is ripe for an explosion in development. The SMP for the area is only interested in ensuring the infrastructure is in place - not limiting building.

Two large home building schemes in Malmesbury are on the table awaiting council decisions. Due to size and location, neither are welcomed by residents or councillors. Is further town expansion inevitable?

23,000 homes to be built between Kemble and Cirencester! This story will stun anyone due to it's enormous size and location. Is this time now when all the people need to be engaged in local policy and plans?

Blueprint - now revealed from secrecy - shows massive plan to build 142,000 new homes by 2051. The build sites will include Kemble - dubbed as one of two new Garden Towns in the county to be built.

There's controversy over developer's plans for 2500plus houses just south of Gloucester. The proposal comes with necessary infrastructure - schools and open spaces - but should we think again on this scheme?